Current Article

3 Ways To Build a Model Investment Portfolio Using ETF’s

Subscribing to my site guarantees you don't miss any new content. Choose either E-Mail Feed or RSS Feed. Thanks for visiting!

possibilitiesI’ve written a lot about why I love ETF’s and in the last paragraph of Tuesday’s post I advocated people think about using them to build out their entire investment portfolio.

Now I know there are investors, advisors, market pundits that may have a different opinion on that, but I believe that in the universe of possibilities this is a very viable alternative.

My entire business is built on ETF’s. Well, let me rephrase that, a great majority of the investment portfolios are ETF based. Please remember before putting these portfolios in place I always start with a financial plan. From there, I get all the answers I need to construct a customized investment portfolio, not the other way around.

In this case, I’m going to present 3 model portfolios that are hypothetical in nature, but may be used as a point of reference for the target market of this blog, those in their 30’s and 40’s. Keep in mind these models are for the growth oriented investor, which is not for everyone. So let’s get to it:

Standard Model- Growth Oriented Investor

This model can be tweaked here and there for individual tastes but it can act as a template for those interested in learning more about ETF’s. The portfolio is broken down into different sizes and styles.

Large Cap Growth - 32%

  • iShares Russell 1000 Growth (IWF) - expense ratio - .20% OR
  • Vanguard Growth VIPERS (VUG) - expense ratio - .11%

Large Cap Value - 25%

  • iSHares Russell 1000 Value (IWD) - expense ratio - .20% OR
  • streetTRACKS DJ Wilshire US Large Cap Value (ELV) - expense ratio - .20%

Mid Cap Growth - 8%

  • iShares Russell Mid Growth (IWP) - expense ratio - .25% OR
  • Vanguard Mid Cap Growth (VOT) - expense ratio - .13%

Mid Cap Value - 8%

  • i Shares Russell Mid Cap Value (IWS) - expense ratio - .25% OR
  • Vanguard Mid Cap Value (VOE) - expense ratio - .13%

Small Cap Growth - 7%

  • iShares Russell 2000 Growth (IWO) expense ratio - .25% OR
  • streetTRACKS DJ Wilshire US Small Cap Growth (DSG) - expense ratio - .25%

Small Cap Value - 5%

  • Vanguard Small Cap Value VIPERS (VBR) - expense ratio - .12% OR
  • iShares Russell 2000 Value (IWN) - expense ratio - .25%

Large Cap Foreign - 6%

  • iShares MSCI EAFE (EFA) - expense ratio - .35%

Emerging Markets - 4%

  • Vanguard Emerging Markets (VWO) - expense ratio - .30%

Cash - 5%

Total 100%

Compressed Model - Growth Oriented Investor

This model is more abbreviated. You will see the different sizes but the styles are absent. For instance, in this model you will see a breakdown of different market caps (capitalizations), but won’t see the breakdown into growth and value (like above). Without further ado:

Large Cap - 60%

  • iShares Russell 1000 Index (IWB) - expense ratio - .15% OR
  • SPDR Index S&P 500 (SPY) - expense ratio - .10%

Mid Cap - 15%

  • iShares Russell Mid Index (IWR) - expense ratio - .20% OR
  • Vanguard Mid Cap (VO) - expense ratio - .13%

Small Cap - 10%

  • iShares Russell 2000 Index (IWM) - expense ratio - .20% OR
  • Vanguard Small Cap VIPER (VB) - expense ratio- .10%

Large Cap Foreign - 10%

  • iShares MSCI EAFE (EFA) - expense ratio - .35%

Cash - 5%

Total - 100%

Concentrated Model - Growth Oriented Investor

This model is even more abbreviated. In Tuesday’s post I noted that having as little as one ETF in your account can deliver diversification. The following concentrated portfolio illustrates that idea.

Now I’d prefer to go with one of the first two options but for those that are concerned about commissions and prefer administrative simplicity, this may be an option.

Domestic Equity - 83%

  • iShares Dow Jones Total Market (IYY) - expense ratio - .20% OR
  • Vanguard Total Stock Market (VTI) - expense ratio - .07%

Large Cap Foreign - 12%

  • iShares MSCI EAFE (EFA) - expense ratio - .35%

Cash - 5%

Total - 100%

There you have it 3 growth oriented portfolios made up entirely of ETF’s.

As you can see the expense ratios for all of these ETF’s are very attractive. A few more bullet points:

  • The highest expense ratio on any modeled ETF is .35% on EFA. Compared to the expense ratios associated with (almost all) mutual funds this is a walk in the park.
  • For the more aggressive equity investor you can easily tweak the allocation to add sector ETF’s or something like the QQQQ (Powershares NASDAQ 100 tracking ETF)
  • For the less aggressive growth oriented equity investor you can easily tweak the allocation to invest between 10 and 15% into (AGG) iShares Lehman Brothers Aggregate Index, which will represent the fixed income component of the portfolio.
  • One of the unique aspects of having an ETF based portfolio is the ability to write covered calls (among other option strategies) to generate additional income. This strategy works very well in the confines of a financial planning developed allocation.

I’m interested to hear if your allocation includes any of these ETF’s?

(Please remember none of this is to be construed as investment advice and refer to my site disclaimer for more on that.)



Subscribing to my site guarantees you don't miss any new content. Choose either E-Mail Feed or RSS Feed. Thanks for visiting!

StumbleUpon
digg this

Related Articles

Trackback URL

5 Comment(s)

  1. Pinyo | Dec 13, 2007 | Reply

    I also like ETF. One thing missing from your portfolio is international allocation. U.S. economy (or capitalization) is less than 50% of the world and it would be a bad move not to have international investment.

  2. CHM | Dec 13, 2007 | Reply

    hey Pinyo,

    Each of those allocations has between 10-12% exposure to international stocks. Just look to the bottom of the allocation.

    The allocation models were just a template. If you’re more comfortable with investing abroad then you can always add more exposure.

    I don’t think it’s ever bad to have more than a majority of your exposure to the US. When building portfolios it’s a lot easier to use history as a guide and quantify potential volatility.

    btw, tomorrow I’m going to write a post in regards to your 12 Investing Mistakes… just wanted to give you a heads up:)

  3. CHM | Dec 13, 2007 | Reply

    and Pinyo,

    congrats on having a baby boy!

  4. Pinyo | Dec 17, 2007 | Reply

    Oops. I missed that one. However, I think the international exposure should be in the 30-50% range, which is more in line with the market cap and GDP; unless there’s a reason to believe that the U.S. will always out perform — which is a big assumption and goes against the theory of diversification/asset allocation.

  5. CHM | Dec 17, 2007 | Reply

    this is all very subjective. depends what matters to you, where you’re most comfortable? Looking for absolute performance vs. relative? Do you feel comfortable bucking conventional wisdom?

    I think you’d be hard pressed to find any equity growth models (from any reputable sources)that advocates 40% (pure) exposure to foreign/emerging markets.

    But like I said it’s subjective, maybe conventional wisdom doesn’t matter so much to you. Maybe you see the world for what it is: an ever expanding market place, that you need to have more and more exposure to.

    Maybe conventional wisdom is too conservative? Maybe conventional wisdom has a 10 year lag?
    Maybe conventional wisdom has a US based bias?

    Like I said before, the referenced models are templates and adding a bit more international exposure is fine, but I think you’re recommended percentages are too high.

    But ofcourse I will always air on the conservative side. I’m interested in the smoothness of ride, as much as performance. And you’re international exposure levels create unneeded volatility IMO, but maybe it works for you.

    I’d add managed futures too (which has a lot of foreign exposure)

Post a Comment